

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A disappointing FDA decision for SOMX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hotstockconfidential.com/alerts_updates/a-disappointing-fda-decision-for-somx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hotstockconfidential.com/alerts_updates/a-disappointing-fda-decision-for-somx/</link>
	<description>Your Hot Stock Confidential</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:05:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lcadden</title>
		<link>http://www.hotstockconfidential.com/alerts_updates/a-disappointing-fda-decision-for-somx/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>lcadden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotstockconfidential.com/?p=1904#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Hello: I hear ya but I&#039;ve been burned twice now by Somaxon. They just aren&#039;t making their case for this drug and with no partners, its questionable that they can continue their research. If they get a partner, it could be worth re-entering... maybe. Laura</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello: I hear ya but I&#8217;ve been burned twice now by Somaxon. They just aren&#8217;t making their case for this drug and with no partners, its questionable that they can continue their research. If they get a partner, it could be worth re-entering&#8230; maybe. Laura</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: epstein73905</title>
		<link>http://www.hotstockconfidential.com/alerts_updates/a-disappointing-fda-decision-for-somx/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>epstein73905</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotstockconfidential.com/?p=1904#comment-216</guid>
		<description>It appears Somaxens&#039; Silenor still has a great chance of FDA approval with resubmission. wouldn&#039;t it be a good time to accumulate? $1.05 is a steal! 
whaddya say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears Somaxens&#8217; Silenor still has a great chance of FDA approval with resubmission. wouldn&#8217;t it be a good time to accumulate? $1.05 is a steal!<br />
whaddya say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Stock</title>
		<link>http://www.hotstockconfidential.com/alerts_updates/a-disappointing-fda-decision-for-somx/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Stock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hotstockconfidential.com/?p=1904#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Like  you, I too felt this could happen, however, I sold SOMX this past Friday for $3.70 (had bought at $2.40).  My question to you is if you anticipate a potential decline in the event that the company does not receive FDA approval, then why not set a stop loss (you touched upon the topic in your TFN update today)?

Thank you for the pick and keep them coming!

Cyrus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like  you, I too felt this could happen, however, I sold SOMX this past Friday for $3.70 (had bought at $2.40).  My question to you is if you anticipate a potential decline in the event that the company does not receive FDA approval, then why not set a stop loss (you touched upon the topic in your TFN update today)?</p>
<p>Thank you for the pick and keep them coming!</p>
<p>Cyrus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
